A prediction score that included such factors as age, blood pressure, heart and respiratory rate for patients who received out-of-hospital emergency care was associated with the development of critical illness during hospitalization such as severe sepsis, the need for mechanical ventilation or death, according to a study in the August 18 issue of JAMA.
"Hospitals vary widely in quality of critical care. Consequently, the outcomes of critically ill patients may be improved by concentrating care at more experienced centers. By centralizing patients who are at greater risk of mortality in referral hospitals, regionalized care in critical illness may achieve improvements in outcome similar to trauma networks," the authors write. "Early identification of nontrauma patients in need of critical care services in the emergency setting may improve triage decisions and facilitate regionalization of critical care."
Christopher W. Seymour, M.D., M.Sc., of Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, and colleagues conducted a study to develop a tool for prediction of critical illness during out-of-hospital care in noninjured, non-cardiac arrest patients, hypothesizing that objective, out-of-hospital factors could discriminate between patients who were and were not likely to develop critical illness during hospitalization. The study included the emergency medical services (EMS) system in greater King County, Washington (excluding metropolitan Seattle), that transports to 16 receiving facilities, and data for nontrauma, non-cardiac arrest adult patients transported to a hospital by King County EMS from 2002 through 2006. Eligible records with complete data (n = 144,913) were linked to hospital discharge data and randomly split into development (n = 87,266 [60 percent]) and validation (n = 57,647 [40 percent]) groups.
Critical illness occurred during hospitalization in 5 percent of the development (n = 4,835) and validation (n = 3,121) cohorts. Multivariable predictors of critical illness (which was defined as severe sepsis, delivery of mechanical ventilation, or death during hospitalization) included older age, lower systolic blood pressure, abnormal respiratory rate, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, lower pulse oximetry (measurement of oxygenation of hemoglobin), and nursing home residence during out-of-hospital care. Using a score threshold of 4 or higher, sensitivity was 0.22 and specificity was 0.98.
"We demonstrate the role that simple physiologic assessment can play in risk stratification in the prehospital period among noninjured patients. The model provides an important foundation for future efforts to identify patients at greatest risk of critical illness using information from the out-of-hospital phase of emergency care," the authors write. "Although improved accuracy and external validation are required, this model provides a foundation for future efforts to identify noninjured patients who may benefit from coordinated systems that regionalize emergency care."
(JAMA. 2010;304[7]:747-754. Available pre-embargo to the media at www.jamamedia.org)
Editor's Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
Editorial: Assessing Critical Illness During Emergency Medical Services Care
Henry E. Wang, M.D., M.S., of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Donald M. Yealy, M.D., of the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, write in an accompanying editorial that although this prediction score does require refinement, it is of benefit.
"First, the prediction rule using out-of-hospital clinical factors can help assess illness burden when analyzing existing data sets or seeking balance between groups before an intervention. Second, this effort offers an initial framework for risk identification in a challenging environment. Perhaps other data, such as body temperature, lactate or other physiologic measurements, specific physical examination, and historical features, could improve the performance of this or any rule. With improved information technology, the potential exists to extract key data and deliver it promptly to out-of-hospital providers and emergency department or critical care personnel at receiving hospitals. Most importantly, this work should prompt re-evaluation of the broader goals and organization of community critical care systems."
Source: JAMA and Archives Journals