Association for Molecular Pathology expresses serious concerns with Congress' attempt to resurrect human gene patenting debate and reverse settled Supreme Court ruling

ROCKVILLE, Md. - June 4, 2019 - The Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), the premier global, molecular diagnostic professional society, expressed serious concerns with Congress' recent proposal to amend Section 101 of the Patent Act. If enacted, the draft legislation would overturn 150 years of patent case law and permit patenting of human genes and naturally-occurring associations between genes and diseases. In a recent letter to Senators Coons and Tillis, and Representatives Collins, Johnson and Stivers, AMP joined a diverse community of 169 medical, scientific, patient advocacy, women's health, and civil rights organizations, opposing the recent proposal.

For over 150 years, the Supreme Court has held that laws of nature, natural phenomena and abstract ideas are not patent-eligible under Section 101 of the Patent Act. In the landmark 2013 Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics1 case, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled in favor of AMP and determined that "A naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated." The Court concluded that such patents would lock up genetic information and prevent others from scientific and medical work.

"The Court's 2013 ruling was the culmination of many years of deep concern within the medical field and was celebrated across the greater scientific community who fought hard for the chance to be heard," said Mary Steele Williams, Executive Director of AMP. "Today, AMP is prepared to win this fight again. In this age of precision medicine, it is more important than ever to maintain the boundaries between nature and technology, so that we can continue to develop innovative diagnostics for devastating diseases and provide access to the best medical care. Since the Supreme Court's decision, multiplex gene panels that feature dozens of genes in a single test are now routine practice. Advances such as this would have been difficult if not impossible without the Court's decision."

AMP maintains its position that the authorization of patents for human genes and naturally occurring associations between genes and diseases would impede the scientific community from working together to discover novel diagnostics and treatments for rare and common diseases including cancer, muscular dystrophy, Alzheimer's disease, and heart disease. It would also create barriers to patients' access to potentially life-saving genomic tests and eliminate access to confirmatory testing. Further, these patents would create monopolies that would stifle competition and dramatically increase costs for payers, patients and the healthcare system overall.

"The fact that the new proposed legislation was drafted with input only from a select group of patent holders, lawyers, large corporations, and the pharmaceutical industry should be of grave concern to the public," said Victoria M. Pratt, PhD, FACMG, Associate Professor, Director of Pharmacogenetics and Molecular Genetics Laboratories, Indiana University School of Medicine, and President of AMP. "AMP members share a common goal of putting the patient first and we will continue to offer our collective expertise and engage key stakeholders and members of Congress to make sure this proposed legislation as currently drafted is not passed into law."

Credit: 
Association for Molecular Pathology